SAMRO AI Survey 2026: The Impact of AI on Music Creators
SAMRO Member Survey · April 2026

The impact of AI on music creators.

502 members across Southern Africa told us how artificial intelligence is reshaping their creative, professional and commercial realities, and what they expect SAMRO to do about it.

502Participants
6Sections
18Questions
97.2%Based in South Africa
Section 01

Who responded: SAMRO Members

The overwhelming majority of respondents were based in South Africa, with additional responses from Lesotho, Eswatini, Namibia, Mozambique, Switzerland, the UK and the US, reflecting SAMRO's growing international footprint.

97.2%

of respondents are based in South Africa

8

countries represented, including Lesotho, Eswatini, Namibia and the UK

3

overlapping creative roles held by most respondents

Primary role in music (respondents could select more than one)
Composers
87.5%
Performers
64.7%
Producers
59.1%

Most respondents fulfil multiple roles within the music industry, as composers, performers and producers. This is significant because AI has the potential to impact every aspect of their creative and commercial livelihoods.

Section 02

AI knowledge, use & experience

How well members currently understand, use and engage with AI tools in their own work.

Q1: How would you rate your understanding of AI?
None or basic understanding
37.1%
Moderate
32.5%
Consider themselves experts
6.4%

More than a third of respondents (37.1%) indicated that they have little or no understanding of AI, while a further third described their knowledge as moderate. By contrast, only 6.4% considered themselves highly knowledgeable.

Q2: Which AI music tools or platforms have you used?
ChatGPT
45.1%
Suno.ai (full AI music generation)
34.3%
Have not used any AI tools
35%

ChatGPT emerged as the most widely used AI tool, with members primarily using it for idea generation, drafting and administrative support. Notably, 34.3% of respondents reported using Suno.ai, a generative AI platform capable of creating complete musical works, highlighting the growing accessibility of AI-powered music creation tools. At the same time, 35% of respondents indicated that they had not used any AI tools.

Q3: Have you ever notified SAMRO of a work where AI was used?
Notified works created entirely without AI
77.5%
AI-assisted, but NOT notified SAMRO yet
10.8%
Have used AI in works to some degree
8.7%

77.5% of respondents indicated that they have not used AI in any works notified to SAMRO. However, 10.8% reported using AI-assisted works without notifying SAMRO. This highlights the need for clear policies, guidance and communication on the disclosure of AI-assisted works, ensuring members understand their obligations as AI becomes increasingly integrated into music creation.

Q4: Which parts of your work involved AI?
Mixing and mastering
11%
Beat-making
8.6%
Songwriting
6.3%
Lyric generation
4.6%

Among respondents who use AI, mixing and mastering (11%) emerged as the most common use, followed by beat-making (8.6%), songwriting (6.3%) and lyric generation (4.6%). AI's growing role in the creative process raises important questions around authorship, ownership and rights administration.

Section 03

Perceptions on AI in music

The findings in this section provide insight into members' perceptions, concerns and expectations as they relate to AI. Understanding these views is essential to shaping SAMRO's policy, advocacy and member support initiatives in response to the evolving AI landscape.

65%

Q5: rated AI as a high or extreme threat to music creators' livelihoods (ratings 4–5 of 5). 52.2% gave the maximum rating. Only 19.3% rated it a low threat.

The findings indicate a high level of concern among members regarding the impact of AI on the music industry. More than half of respondents (52.2%) rated AI as a major threat (5 out of 5), while 65% viewed it as a high or extreme threat (ratings of 4 or 5). By comparison, only 19.3% perceived AI as posing a low threat. These results suggest that many music creators view AI as a significant challenge to their livelihoods and rights, reinforcing the need for SAMRO to prioritise education, advocacy and policy development to ensure creators are equipped to navigate an increasingly AI-driven music ecosystem.

Q6: Could AI also create opportunities for music creators?
Yes, could create opportunities
51.2%
No, only a threat
24.5%
Unsure
24.3%

Despite widespread concerns about AI, respondents also recognised its potential benefits. Just over half (51.2%) believe AI could create opportunities for music creators, while 24.5% saw it solely as a threat and 24.3% remained uncertain. These findings suggest that members hold a balanced view of AI, acknowledging both its opportunities and its risks.

Q7: AI-generated music should...
Be regulated with human artist protections
49.1%
Be banned completely
23%
Be embraced as creative evolution
18%

Members expressed a clear preference for regulation over prohibition. Nearly half (49.1%) believe AI-generated music should be regulated with appropriate protections for human creators, while 23% support a complete ban and 18% believe AI should be embraced as part of the creative evolution. Overall, 72.1% of respondents favour either regulating or banning AI-generated music, signalling a strong expectation that SAMRO should advocate for a robust regulatory framework that protects the rights and livelihoods of music creators while supporting responsible innovation.

Q8: What concerns you most about AI in music?
AI replacing creative jobs
64.1%
Unauthorised use of voice or work
56.8%
Loss of income and royalties
54.4%
No consent or credit to original artists
52.8%
Lack of African inclusion in global AI regulation
38%

Members' concerns extend beyond copyright to the broader sustainability of creative careers. The greatest concern identified was AI replacing creative jobs (64.1%), followed by the unauthorised use of voices and creative works (56.8%), loss of income and royalties (54.4%), and the lack of consent or credit for original creators (52.8%). A further 38% of respondents expressed concern that Africa is underrepresented in global AI regulatory discussions. These findings highlight the need for SAMRO to advocate for stronger legal protections, fair remuneration, informed consent and greater African participation in shaping the future governance of AI in the music industry.

Section 04

AI & law in South Africa

This section examines members' understanding of South Africa's legal and regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI).

Q9: Are you aware that SA has no specific AI law?
Aware SA has no specific AI law
58.4%
Did NOT know, operating in the dark
41.6%

58.4% of respondents were aware that South Africa does not yet have legislation specifically regulating AI, while 41.6% were not. This reinforces the need for greater awareness of the evolving legal landscape. It also underscores the importance of SAMRO continuing to advocate for an appropriate legal and regulatory framework, while developing interim policies and guidance to help protect members' rights as AI adoption accelerates.

89.2%

Q10: say SAMRO should advocate for AI protection legislation to shield music creators from misuse of AI. Only 3.8% disagreed.

There is overwhelming support for SAMRO to play an advocacy role in shaping AI regulation. 89.2% of respondents believe SAMRO should advocate for legislation to protect music creators from the misuse of AI, while only 3.8% disagreed.

Q11: How does SA's lack of AI regulation make creators feel? (open question)

The most prominent sentiments in members' own words: worried, unprotected, threatened, unsafe, vulnerable, insecure, compromised, exposed. Four themes dominated the responses:

Theme A

IP & exploitation

Members are concerned their music, voices and creative styles are used to train AI systems without consent or compensation.

Theme B

Devaluing human creativity

AI can replicate creative output in seconds, threatening both income and recognition of the skill behind original work.

Theme C

Urgency & leadership

Members expect SAMRO to take a proactive lead, with timely advocacy, policy development and practical intervention.

Theme D

Market impact & authenticity

Unregulated AI-generated music could saturate the market, undermining authentic artistic expression and fair competition.

Q12: How should AI music systems be held accountable?
Giving credit to original artists
69.8%
Paying licence fees for copyrighted works
68.5%
Copyright limitations on AI
53.6%
Industry-led guidelines
49.4%
National policies
42.7%

Respondents expressed strong support for accountability measures that protect the rights of music creators. The most widely supported measures were crediting original artists (69.8%) and paying licence fees for the use of copyrighted works (68.5%), followed by copyright limitations on AI (53.6%), industry-led guidelines (49.4%) and national policies (42.7%). These findings indicate that members favour a balanced approach combining legal protections, fair remuneration and industry standards to ensure AI is deployed responsibly within the music ecosystem.

Section 05

Challenges unique to African musicians

This section explores the unique challenges faced by African music creators, recognising the need for solutions that reflect the continent's legal, economic and technological realities.

Q13: Which challenges already affect your ability to succeed in music?
Limited royalties tracking & distribution
62.8%
Lack of legal literacy
43%
Absence of local African discovery platforms
42%
Global systems not recognising African music
41.5%
Exploitation by intermediaries
40.3%
Unstable internet & digital infrastructure
28.8%

The findings show that AI is compounding existing challenges rather than creating entirely new ones. Members identified limited royalty tracking and distribution (62.8%) as their greatest challenge, followed by lack of legal literacy (43%), the absence of African discovery platforms (42%), limited recognition of African music by global systems (41.5%), and exploitation by intermediaries (40.3%). These results highlight the need for AI interventions that also address the broader structural challenges facing African music creators.

76%+

Q14: believe African musicians are at a disadvantage in the global AI music revolution

38%

cite underrepresentation in AI training datasets

43%

highlight the legal protection gap versus global peers

More than 76% of respondents believe African music creators are at a disadvantage in the global AI landscape. Key concerns include the underrepresentation of African music in AI training datasets (38%) and a lack of legal protections compared with global markets (43%). These findings underscore the need for stronger advocacy to ensure African music, creators and cultural expression are fairly represented, protected and recognised in the development and governance of AI technologies.

Q15: What should SAMRO, SADC governments or institutions do?

Five themes dominated members' responses:

Priority

Legislation & regulation

Establish AI-specific legislation that updates copyright law, defines ownership of AI-generated works, and prioritises African artists.

Priority

Monetisation & compensation

Restrict AI-generated music from receiving royalties; create detection systems that verify human authorship before registration.

Priority

Education & awareness

Invest in educating musicians at every level, including rural communities, on their rights and how to use AI ethically and defensively.

Priority

SAMRO's own house

Fix internal systems first: improve royalty distribution, upgrade technology, and invest in automated matching for undocumented works.

Priority

Protecting African cultural identity

Create or license African-owned AI training datasets, and protect African traditional music, languages and genres from extraction without permission.

Section 06

Future outlook & support needed

This section explores the support, resources and knowledge that members believe they need to navigate the evolving AI landscape.

Q16: What would you like to learn about AI and music?
How SAMRO plans to respond to AI
78.9%
Copyright protection in the age of AI
71.6%
How AI affects their royalties
70.8%
South Africa's specific legal gaps
55%
How to safely use AI for their music
50.5%
African-specific AI case studies
42.3%

Members expressed a strong appetite for AI education and practical guidance. The highest priority is understanding SAMRO's response to AI (78.9%), followed by copyright protection (71.6%) and AI's impact on royalties (70.8%). More than half also want guidance on South Africa's legal framework (55%) and how to use AI responsibly in music creation (50.5%). These findings reinforce the need for a comprehensive member education programme that combines legal awareness, practical skills and ongoing communication as AI continues to reshape the music industry.

90.4%

Q17: would likely attend a SAMRO AI webinar or workshop (66.9% definitely, a further 23.5% maybe).

Members demonstrated a strong willingness to engage with AI education initiatives. 66.9% indicated they would definitely attend a SAMRO AI webinar or workshop, while a further 23.5% said they would likely participate. With 90.4% expressing interest overall, the findings highlight a clear opportunity for SAMRO to deliver targeted education and capacity-building programmes that equip members to navigate the evolving AI landscape.

Q18: Final thoughts, what else should SAMRO consider?

Five strategic priorities emerged from members' final thoughts:

01

Human creators first

Set minimum human contribution thresholds, identify AI-generated content, and keep human creators as recognised authors.

02

Protect human royalties

Build a clear framework so royalties owed to human creators aren't diluted by AI-generated content.

03

Expand member education

Deliver accessible workshops, online learning, mobile-friendly resources and plain-language legal guidance.

04

Strengthen policy & advocacy

Align with international CMOs, push for stronger AI legislation, and require disclosure of AI-assisted works at registration.

05

Leverage AI to improve services

Explore responsible use of AI to strengthen SAMRO's own operations: royalty tracking, distribution and member-facing platforms.

Closing Remarks

The findings of this survey provide a clear mandate for action. While members recognise the opportunities presented by artificial intelligence, they have also expressed legitimate concerns about its impact on creativity, copyright, royalties and the future of music creation. Above all, the results demonstrate a strong expectation that SAMRO will continue to lead through advocacy, education, policy development and innovation to ensure that the rights and interests of music creators remain protected in an increasingly AI-driven world.

We extend our sincere appreciation to every member who participated in the survey. Your insights, experiences and perspectives have been invaluable in shaping SAMRO's understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by AI. The findings will inform our engagement with policymakers, industry partners and international organisations, while guiding the development of initiatives that support and empower music creators in the years ahead.

"SAMRO remains committed to ensuring that technology serves to enhance, and not diminish, the value of human creativity."